Quote:
Originally Posted by markpaul
On the Old Testament part, it is appealing to argue that “the parts were not quoted in the New Testament should be rejected.” But with the fact that the Old Testament was finished before Jesus’ first Advent tells me that the argument is flaw because Jesus or His Apostles never mentioned (correct me if you found opposite) the rejection claim before Apostle John wrote down the Revelation.
|
Lee did not reject them outright. But he did disparage them. He said they were "low" and "natural" and "fallen men's concepts". This is partway to the Eastern Lightning heresy to reject the Bible and create new "speaking from God."
And there is no precedent in New Testament scripture for treating the Old Testament writings the way that Witness Lee did. None.
And we treated Witness Lee's speaking as if it came from God, and the Old Testament prophet's word as if it were the natural concept of fallen humans. A very dangerous turn of events.