Quote:
|
Originally Posted by markpaul
I should explain more about I didn’t read Rcv and Lee’s notes. When I planned to read Bible (study Bible myself at home), I found Rcv was thicker than Chinese Union Version (Cuv) because the former including Lee’s notes. So I chose Cuv. After reading Cuv and other (e.g. NKJV), I found I could not enjoy church life with other LCers anymore. So I left without reading Rcv.
|
So much of the LC revolves around what supports their teachings. If someone chooses to use a Bible version besides the RcV that doesn't have an LC agenda behind it, they are not going to end up with a view that is supportive of the LC. That is the intention of the RcV, to support WL's teachings and provide a channel that all those teachings can be made known.
Some of the key teachings of WL and LSM don't seem so convincing when you look at the way other translations render the same verses they use to support their teachings.