[Freedom]

Originally Posted by aron

I'd be interested in hearing RK or BP utter those 4 words in sequence: "Witness Lee made mistakes". How might they frame that idea, to allow the least damage? They'd surely be wary of opening the door to examining "the apostle" WL the way that the so-called apostle examined everything else. At best I'd expect a generic statement that admits the possibility of imperfection, without any expectation to look further.

The blendeds might be willing to admit that Lee made mistakes, however, they would likely turn right back around and question our motives in asking them to admit that. All we are doing here is to offer criticism where it is due (as they do also attempt to do in their A&C journal). When they criticize, it's all fun and games. If it's directed at them or the LC, they immediately assume ulterior motives. But as was just discussed in a different thread, if the critique leads to the conclusion that their so-called "recovery" is actually degraded, then that is the worst publicity possible for them. In that respect, it's understandable why they are so afraid.