View Single Post
Old 08-28-2015, 11:27 AM   #31
TLFisher
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Renton, Washington
Posts: 3,545
Default Re: David, Saul, and Deputy Authority

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freedom View Post
Without some type of headquarters or authority structure, I don't believe the ground of locality could have been practiced at all. Everything falls apart the minute you have two churches in a city both trying to say they are the church in X.
That may be the case if you want an LSM franchise in a city. There are cases of former LSM affiliated localities that go on without connections to a headquarters (Moses Lake, Rosemead, Toronto, etc). Of course as it's been discussed before only one can take the name as "The Church in ____".
Hypothetically take the Sandovals. They're not welcome in Vista because of the deputy authority hierarchy structure. Could always take the name as The Church in San Marcos. When LSM wanted to open up a franchise in San Marcos, they would need to take a different name or wait until the name became available.
__________________
The Church in Los Angeles 1971-1972 Phoenix 1972-1973 Albuquerque 1973-1975 Anaheim 1976-1979 San Bernardino 1979-1986 Bellevue 1993-2000 Renton 2009-2011
TLFisher is offline   Reply With Quote