Quote:
Originally Posted by Freedom
The DCP could extend Nigel the courtesy of responding to his writings. They did while the quarantines were occurring, then they stopped. Maybe they don't feel it's worth the effort now. But I take their silence as an admission of guilt. It doesn't seem DCP does anything these days.  I would hate to be someone in the LC donating money to them. |
Used to be in announcements when I used to attend 2009/2010, weekly soliciting giving to DCP for defense against the internet.
Speaking of DCP I believe it was late 2011/early 2012 "Indiana" called DCP offering to meet with them. They were conveniently unavailable. Probably as Freedom said; "
silence as an admission of guilt". Articles such as Steve Isitt among others they don't want to address.
1. It would provide free advertisement.
2. In their conscience the brothers at DCP know Steve is accurate in his writings.
3. Should they ever entertain initiating a lawsuit, do they really want to risk having to subject the blended coworkers to depositions? As there is nothing to be gained by it.