Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Part of Lee's high peak sales pitch was that our Christian walk was based on our theology, and the higher our theology, the better our walk, or so he said. Initially i was open to the idea, but soon realized that there was little evidence to support his claims about "beoming God." Remember ... we had just passed thru some "rebellious storms" in the recovery, and nobody's walk seemed to be improving, unless you consider their "walk" out the door of the LC. Many were dicouraged and leaving.
That whole process back in the early 90's occurred in the vacuum of any facts surrounding John Ingalls and the other so-called "leprous conspirators." We now know that entire Lee's sales pitch was really just a diversionary con job. He pushed the high peak junk on us, not to improve our walk, but to cover up his own unrighteous walk, and that of his profligate son Phillip, the abusive LSM Office Manager.
Today the whole Recovery still believes that those high peak teachings were from the Lord, from the Bible, and for our benefit. None of which was further from the truth.
|
I early on had this quirky thought that it was so good that our God was not self conscious. He could have well been offended that He didn't rate anywhere with the speaking of Paul.
There were around one hundred messages spoken on the book of Ephesians. I began to sleep thru some of the trainings during some of these speakings.
To me it was absurd to rate the books of the Bible as the heart of the divine revelation. Who could WL think he was
Lisbon