Quote:
Originally Posted by Indiana
Jerry's first email 2010
"I asked Sherman about you and your history in the church in this area. I was appalled to find out that you have not only written one book (which I knew about but never read), but also that you maintain two websites full of slander regarding the Lord’s Recovery, and specifically regarding at least eight coworkers and several elders.
Regardless of what new ones you want to introduce to me, there is no way I can have fellowship with you. Your behavior is divisive, and you have not shown any willingness to repent. If you reply that these facts are not true, then I’ll only believe that after you’ve taken down your
slanderous web sites and come face to face with Sherman and Joel and the other elders in Seattle and Bellevue and retract the materials you have written. [My emphasis]
You told me that you want to be allowed to fellowship with the church in Bellevue, yet your actions tell another story. I have given the Lord and His Recovery thirty seven years of my life, and there is no other life I desire to live. Don’t bother sending me any more emails. I’m just going to delete them anyways. J. M. Dec 2010
|
I remember
Jerry M. from Cleveland. He is a dear brother who loves the Lord and his people, but sorry to say ...
he keeps drinking that Kool-Aid without reading the ingredients.
If
Jerry M. (originally from Milwaukee, and also was in Kent) feels this strongly about Steve Isitt, I can't imagine how he feels about Titus Chu, all the elders and workers in the GLA, and all the LC's in the area which were excommunicated by the Blindeds in Anaheim at LSM.
I would like to ask rhetorically whose behavior is the most divisive, and who is in need of repenting the most? I doubt if it is any of these one talented members who have invested their lives in the Recovery. I place the bulk of the responsibility on those rotten leaders at LSM.