Local Church Discussions - View Single Post

Timotheist · 05-31-2015, 07:23 AM

Had no idea Comfort was in the LC. Ohio, you should get him on this forum. I would like to challenge and be challenged by him.

The only way I have to contrast Comfort and Ehrman at this point (having read neither beyond the scope of the Luke variant) is this: On the matter of the Luke variant, Ehrman jumped to a conclusion that he likes, whereas Comfort detailed the two sides of the discussion fairly.

I learned more from the Comfort reading than I did from Awareness' citation of Ehrman. Perhaps there was more 'meat' in Ehrman before pronouncing his conclusion?

05-31-2015, 07:23 AM	#9
Timotheist Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Huntsville, AL Posts: 424	Re: Virgin Birth questioned: the research Had no idea Comfort was in the LC. Ohio, you should get him on this forum. I would like to challenge and be challenged by him. The only way I have to contrast Comfort and Ehrman at this point (having read neither beyond the scope of the Luke variant) is this: On the matter of the Luke variant, Ehrman jumped to a conclusion that he likes, whereas Comfort detailed the two sides of the discussion fairly. I learned more from the Comfort reading than I did from Awareness' citation of Ehrman. Perhaps there was more 'meat' in Ehrman before pronouncing his conclusion?