Quote:
Originally Posted by awareness
Not true for Kangas. I remember writing to Ron K. when I discovered David Kangas established "www.jimmoranexposed.com." I pointed it out to him and asked two questions. 1) Did he know about it? and, 2) If so why would he be fighting a rear guard rather than go on with the Lord's blessings.
RK wrote back to me with an angry tone, and eventually told me I had no right to question his spirituality.
Also, Kangas publicly called Steve a man of death. And warns the saints against him.
We've seen more evidence that Kangas keeps up with the negative material on the web. For example, back when the old Bereans forum was going my dear friend Hosepipe was calling Witness Lee Witless Lee. Shortly after that, Kangas remarked about that too.
The LC leadership is very concerned about what's being said about Lee and the LC on the web. They do their best to counter it by covering up the web with all their material. Just read wiki on Watchman Nee if you want to read a sample of it.
|
I just meant that they must see suppressing concerns as worth the risk of people taking concerns to the internet.
Some of the BB's have made it obvious that they read things on the internet. What you say about Ron's son David, that's interesting. Sounds like David is a "lawless user of the internet".
Ron is the one who has made it clear that he is bothered about what is on the internet. Of all the BB's he's the one that seems to reference it the most. If he's really that concerned about it, why doesn't he come here for a friendly debate?