Quote:
Originally Posted by Freedom
If LC leaders don't like what is said on the internet, why haven't they taken the opportunity to address those concerns? What I think is that they have done a risk assessment and decided that the defectors that will go to the internet are few and far between, therefore it is not a problem worthy of devoting too much time to.
|
Not true for Kangas. I remember writing to Ron K. when I discovered David Kangas established "www.jimmoranexposed.com." I pointed it out to him and asked two questions. 1) Did he know about it? and, 2) If so why would he be fighting a rear guard rather than go on with the Lord's blessings.
RK wrote back to me with an angry tone, and eventually told me I had no right to question his spirituality.
Also, Kangas publicly called Steve a man of death. And warns the saints against him.
We've seen more evidence that Kangas keeps up with the negative material on the web. For example, back when the old Bereans forum was going my dear friend Hosepipe was calling Witness Lee Witless Lee. Shortly after that, Kangas remarked about that too.
The LC leadership is very concerned about what's being said about Lee and the LC on the web. They do their best to counter it by covering up the web with all their material. Just read wiki on Watchman Nee if you want to read a sample of it.