Quote:
Originally Posted by NewManLiving
According to brother Kaung's statements, he was trying to avoid further conflict with brother Lee. Obviously there was personal disagreement and some type of "misunderstanding" between the two. Now a person may speculate as to what this misunderstanding might have been but this appears to be something personal. I seriously doubt that it had anything to do with there being two assemblies or churches in the same city. I believe that brother Kaung would have said so. After listening to brother Kaungs tapes and videos for several years I have never heard him speak concerning the doctrine of locality. Brother Kaung's burden is about presenting ourselves a living sacrifice to God; The eternal purpose of God which is centered in Christ Jesus; The heading up of all things in Christ; the manifestation of the sons of God, and especially to encourage us to be a people who love His appearing and love Him with incorruptible love.
|
Then Neither Lee nor Kaung were strict followers of Nee. (Not saying that being more true to Nee is a good thing.)Nee was clearly of the mind that their assembly was unique within a city. He made a really big deal about one church per city. Lee added a ritual of taking the ground, while Kaung seems to have at least softened on the position. Maybe even to the extent that he saw the reality of the church in the many assemblies in a city.
But being a follower of Nee is still problematic, just not in as extreme a way as being a follower of Lee. I'll leave it at that for now.