Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry
When some of us on this forum were involved on thebereans.net forum, this was discussed. When the directorship was up to vote, those pro-LSM wanted to be elected. DCP was also involved in this local matter.
As we witnessed the events unfold via the internet, it became apparent in the Great Lakes area, the split within churches and among churches was:
A. The ground being LSM
B. The ground being Titus' ministry
C. The ground being Christ
|
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that what used to be the old church in Toronto became the non-LSM church in Toronto. The LSM saints started a new church in Toronto, so these two churches co-exist, each claiming to be standing on the ground of locality. It's almost comical in a way, because it exposes the ground of locality doctrine for what it really is. If the LSM saints did indeed start a new "church in Toronto", then according to their doctrine, how could they "take the ground", if the ground is already taken? Wouldn't both sides claim that they were "standing on the ground" before the split? Then after the split each would claim the other is not standing on the ground.
