View Single Post
Old 01-09-2015, 08:53 PM   #228
awareness
Member
 
awareness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
Default Re: LSM's Etymological Errors - Nigel Tomes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassidy View Post
It is clear Tomes intended to convey his beliefs refuting the inerrancy of the Bible.
I can't be certain that Tome's intended to pull the rug out from inerrancy. My impression of Nigel, tho I may be wrong, is that he's a Bible believer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassidy
It was a central point of his argument....
The central point? Could you please point it out to me, if it's not too much trouble.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassidy
the updated modern view based on Barr.
Barr is an indicator. I'll give you that. Tho not a checkmate of Tome's being firmly in Barr's corner.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassidy
If he does not hold that belief but only used it as a point of attack on Witness Lee then that would be even worse.
Well it would mean Nigel has a huge blind spot. That undermines his whole treatise.

And prolly makes Ron Kangas split a gut laughing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassidy
My beliefs are not static either.... but what matters is in which direction they are heading.
Well I think we all wish to be heading in the right direction. The right direction is toward what is true.

And I wish that for you bro Cassidy ... as to myself also.

Blessings ...
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to.
There's a serpent in every paradise.
awareness is offline   Reply With Quote