Quote:
Originally Posted by Thankful Jane
SC, please quote me where I made the used the word "all" loosely or "endorsed" it. If you can't you should retract your statement.
Also, why do you feel it is necessary to falsely accuse me of something? Please tell me how you can know whether my puzzlement is real or not? You may not like what I write, but such an accusation is over the line.
|
Jane,
I have neither the time nor interest in poring back through your many lengthy posts to prove whether or not you used the word "all" or not. Matt used it and you have endorsed his argument from the beginning. Even on this page you wrote:
Why is it so important that the word "all" not be used when talking about idolatry in the LC? The constant drum beat from a number of posters here is that all were not guilty. I don't believe I have ever said all were, in a blanket or generic fashion. I think I qualified it with some explanation of what I believed idolatry was, but again, why is this such a big deal?
Here you give implicit endorsement to the idea that all were guilty of idolatry. But this all seems a diversionary tactic. Why not state plainly where you stand on this all or nothing matter?
Let me put it to you plainly: Do you think "all" who met in the Lord's Recovery for any length of time were guilty of idolatry?
If you say no and draw a clear line at the level on the all or nothing continuum where you believe idolatry was practiced, I'll retract my previous post.
SC