Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
...
But since it appears that the book of Cahn has spoken on at least some of the premises, it behooves someone who has read it to provide the basis. Not just jump to the conclusions that would follow if the basis was correct. When the thread was started over a year ago, one of the persons supporting this position declined. Another did not have the time (and I believe that to be true). But the refusal remains. There is no discussion without something to discuss. At this point, we are bantering over presumptions. And that is on both sides.
|
Seriously? You want "someone" who has read the book to "provide the basis" for a discussion? Why don't
you do it? You are the one who knows what that means. What does it mean?
Uh...wait...have you been throwing rocks at
The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn all this time having never read it? That could certainly generate what you call "banter over presumptions".
Maybe reading the book is all the "basis" necessary? If not, it would certainly be a good place to start.
Nell