[zeek]

Is every thread on this board going to be hijacked by a discussion of inerrancy? I thought that Tomes made it clear that his article does not attack the fundamentals. Inerrancy is one of the fundamentals, so it is off topic as far as this thread goes. Besides there's already a thread devoted to that subject. Isn't there enough to consider here already between etymology and linguistics? Tomes has called Lee's etymological method into question. If that's the case, every single Lee exposition of Biblical words should be re-examined. Yes? No?