Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Debelak
Some, who are convinced that "eldership" is prescriptive, use the prior practice of "eldership" in the Jewish tradition as positive evidence (not negative evidence, as I would) that eldership in the church is prescribed. Here is one such example:
"It can be plausibly argued that the reason why the New Testament is not more explicit in regard to church government is that it presupposes, as prescriptive, familiar principles of organization in use in the Old Testament, the synagogue, and perhaps in Hellenistic institutions. "
This approach, it seems to me, gives short-shrift to the massive paradigm-shift that was Christ's incarnation, death and resurrection.
Thoughts?
Peter
|
Can't I manage to post anything without using the phrase "universal church"?
Nope.
Rome is the ultimate source of the post hoc continuation doctrines of this sort, my friend, and "short-shrift" is a massively-kind understatement.
You and I are in solid agreement on this point. It really seems to me that the problem of the continuation of administration is ultimately what we're talking about.
Wish I had time to do more right now but I will apply myself in this direction as soon as I can...