Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
My gut reaction is to doubt it. Since Gaffin has pretty thoroughly footnoted his work, I would think that he would have at least acknowledged Lee's influence if not some specific writing if there was cross-pollination.
|
But, if so, wouldn't Gaffin be disinclined to cite a non-scholar, such as Lee? Lee wasn't a scholar of anything. If anything he was a pretend scholar ... like he was a pretend oracle/apostle/MOTA of God. And a pretend expert on 15:45.
But I agree , there's no evidence of cross-pollination between Gaffin & Lee.