Re: "Become" or "Not Become" Interpreting 1Cor 15:45
Thanks ICA for presenting the intrigue between the EO and the RCC on the precision of the trinity.
One thing we know for certain is that the apostle Paul did not hold to the trinity with the precision we have today.
2 Corinthians 13:13 is weak in support of any such notion.
Because, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost is spoken of all over the Bible. So therefore, by such logic, that 13:13 is evidence that Paul was a trinitarian, the trinity can be read into all of it ... by overlaying our present conception of the trinity onto all of the Bible. It's a contrivance.
If we do this, we risk Witness Lee's error, of seeing his vision everywhere in the Bible, like even seeing it in the Song of Songs.
Let's not repeat his errors, in our theological mentations.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to.
There's a serpent in every paradise.
|