Quote:
Originally Posted by Elden1971
|
Reading Wm. Kelly for the first time, he seems high on sarcasm and a little low on clarity. A clear refutation would take all of Govett's points and refute them according to the plain words of scripture.
Kelly's writing seems almost as abstruse as his mentor Darby, who cared more to impress the reader than to actually minister to him. Darby continually excused himself of this tendency by claiming that he "only thinks on paper." In this regard, both could have learned from Macintosh.
Kelly may be right, he is just not making a clear refutation.