Quote:
Originally Posted by Elden1971
Bro. Freidel I must agree with Ohio. His comments are just factual. The preterist viewpoint which you espouse is simply not defensible. Scofield incidentally did not do any of the prophetic footnotes in the Scofield Bible ...all were done by Arno Gaebelein and I personally find him to be one of the most sound prophetic teachers ever that always leads you to Christ in all his writings.
|
Terry: Let us stay with facts then. I have stated that I am not a preterist but I believe in fulfilled prophecy. You say it is not defensible? The truth of the Bible is not defensible? May I take the liberty then to tell you that the defense of modern-day Israel is unBiblical and indefensible. It has no scriptural grounds.
As far as Arno Gaebelein goes: you are entitled to your opinion. However, I never mentioned Gaebelein but Cyrus Ingerson Scofield, after whom the Scofield Bible was named. He led a shameful life.