Quote:
Originally Posted by Friedel
Then about a century ago there came a man with a dishonorable personal history, Cyrus Ingerson Scofield, who published the Scofield Bible, incorporating all the Brethren teachings and leading millions astray.
Then came Witness Lee… (and many other Dispensationalists) teaching all this grandiose nonsense.
And in the process the Bible and the teachings of God’s Word have become secondary even if none of these teachings make sense.
Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21 and the Book of Revelation were fulfilled in 70 AD.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
John wrote Revelation some 20 years after it was fulfilled?
Some of Mark 13 was fulfilled in 70 AD, but vv 26-27 were not.
Some of Matt 24 was fulfilled in 70 AD, but vv 27-30 were not.
Some of Luke 21 was fulfilled in 70 AD, but v 27 was not.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Friedel
Ohio: I have never been unkind to you or any other poster. Why you had to adopt this tone of superiority towards me, I do not know.
You apparently determined to be facetious and to belittle me, hence your statements.
Let us forget about your remarks regarding Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21 but let us consider the other remark about the time of writing of Revelation. (By the way, I reject your remarks about Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21.)
Traditionally, it is stated that Revelation was written around 95-96 AD, during the reign of Domitian.
|
Brother
Friedel, this must be some misunderstanding here. This last post of mine was not unkind, nor did it have a tone of superiority towards you. Read my short post again. It was only an honest negation into your statement that those chapters and the book of Revelation were fulfilled in AD 70. There was nothing in my tone that was either facetious or belittling towards you.
That said, you have stated some extreme views which I have every right to challenge, or at least question on an open forum. If another poster disagrees with any or all of your views, please don't take it personally.