Quote:
Originally Posted by Indiana
They should make specific concessions over specific concerns, but to get general concessions over specific concerns is a start. For example, they should have the integrity to admit the fact that
1) Philip Lee was a huge factor in causing turmoil and division in the Local Churches.
2) That co-workers did cover over his sins in the office and his abusive and divisive behavior among churches.
3) That leaving him out of "official" accounts of Local Church history is a travesty.
|
While I agree with you that LSM
should make specific concessions over specific concerns, they never will. That would open up a bucket of worms like no other, and their whole house of cards would come crashing down. Their integrity is superseded by their own existence.
What if someone like that new poster
Lisbon, who was in the Recovery for 41 years, found out that Witness Lee lied about John Ingalls to coverup the fact that his son Philip was molesting the female volunteer help at the Living Stream ministry offices on
Ball Road.
"No, Mr. Isitt, there will be no concessions forthcoming from LSM." 