Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
The only reason Ron Kangas would personally slander Steve Isitt publicly in that conference would be that Steve's writings were affecting their people, both established members and new ones. Probably, due to the world wide web, Steve's writings about LSM failures and past scandals, formerly hidden from the saints in South America, became widespread during the time of Dong's quarantine.
If that were not so, Steve would not even know that he was a "man of death."  The Apostle Paul was also an honest writer, and he became an "enemy" to some of the saints in Galatia. (4.16)
Despite all the rhetoric to the contrary, LSM does not actually love the "truth," rather it is only those exhausting doctrines of Witness Lee that they love. |
I understand what you're saying Ohio. What I don't understand is with LSM co-workers having a track record of speaking indirectly through innuendos and veiled speaking, why would one co-worker break M.O. and speak directly?