Quote:
Originally Posted by Indiana
5) Ron and Kerry felt that John’s speaking presented a distorted picture of the Lord’s recovery and of the Lord’s up-to-date move in His recovery. They felt it was necessary to expose and refute “this distortion” and that a word of truth should be given. Having thoroughly considered both sides of the matter, it isn’t John Ingalls who gave a distorted picture of the Lord’s recovery; rather, he spoke honestly and faithfully. However, Ron Kangas and Kerry Robichaux have given a much distorted picture of John Ingalls in their analysis and response to John’s speaking. I ask Ron and Kerry to consider the facts about John, the church in Anaheim, and the recovery in those years of turmoil, 1986-1989, and to be willing to adjust their concept accordingly.
|
We should soberly note that Ron and Kerry's version of events in
A Response to Recent Accusations surrounding Anaheim in the late 80's is only believable if they can successfully silence the other side of the debate. Unless they have complete control over all access to information, LSM is in serious trouble.
Once any fair-minded reader compares their version of events with John Ingalls'
Speaking the Truth in Love, the truth is readily apparent. I have corresponded with numerous members of the Recovery who have told me as much. They accepted Lee's reporting of events based on his reputation at the time, and because that's all they knew.