[Thankful Jane]

Originally Posted by SpeakersCorner

Actually, Thankful Jane, the burden to define is upon you. You are the one who has accused the LC of being demon-influenced from day one. What is your definition of demon (or evil spirits as you formerly called it) influence?

First you say you don't buy my definition, which means you think I gave one. Next you say the burden id on me is to give a definition. So which is it?

I'll take this as your way of refusing to answer my question. That's okay by me. I will also take your refusal to mean that you don't have a definition or that if you do, you don't care to share it and help us understand what you believe about the topic, or that you just want to give me a hard time.

In the interest of seeking truth, not becoming a Webster's contributor, I was already planning on sharing more of what I see about the topics of idolatry and how Satan's hosts fit into that picture. I am not trying to produce a formal definition for others.

I am open to input on the topic itself to help clarify. However, I don't hear any of that yet.

I'm more than willing to be proven wrong in my assessments, but not just by a few statements that people don't think there are demons involved. I'd like to see the scriptural basis for saying this.

Originally Posted by SpeakersCorner

I'm also waiting for you to give some concise evidence that Witness Lee was under the influence of evil spirits from the outset of the recovery in the U.S.SC

I don't remember making this statement. If I did, please quote me so I can see the context.

Thankful Jane