Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
Since Lee is the source of the teaching on recovery, he is the source of all data concerning it. Even if he were to claim to have discovered it within scripture, it is still the result of his own analysis of that scripture.
Then, if the definition of recovery is dependent upon his analysis of scripture, it would tend to follow that he would naturally find that he followed his own thinking on the subject.
|
Classic
OBW at his best.
What he's saying is that if Lee invented the Recovery, then he is by definition the global expert on the Recovery.
Just like if I invented McFleebles, then I darn sure am the expert on McFleebles.
That was in essence Lee's mentality, and error. It is crucial to understand this to the core.
He called it "the Lord's recovery." But the fact is it was really Lee's recovery. It was his invention.