Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
zeek,
Quite a disingenuous reply.
The forum is for ex LCers . . . and for others. But that is not the definition of the purpose of the forum. It is for the discussion of the LRC and also its problems.
And when Unto and Igzy point out that it is not for the determination that the OT is about a different God, or inconsistent with the NT, or something else, they are entirely correct.
There is an accepted premise that this is a discussion within Christian thinking about the problems with a group that is inside of Christian thinking (well, mostly inside). The purpose is not to decide that accepting the God of the OT is problematic or questionable.
|
I didn't raise the question ZNP did. He asked, "Is the OT God different from the NT God, or is this the God who is laying the foundation for the one new man?" So, you have misdirected your rebuke toward me.
Quote:
|
So you can stop with the simplistic declaration that (in so many words says) "the forum is for ex-LCers, I am an ex-LCer, so I can talk about anything I #$&@-well please." That has never been the truth.
|
Here you intentionally misquote me. Anyone can read my post and see that I did not say that. Why did you find it necessary to change my words to make your point? Was that a righteous thing to do?
I am aware that this is a strictly moderated site where I am not free to talk about anything I please. It is out of respect for the rules of the forum that I refrained from saying more about how God seems to change from the OT to the NT.