Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
The most recent schism, of LSM & GLA & Arvore da Vida, seems to be about merchandising rights, if it is about anything.
|
Setting aside all the posturing and "spiritual" jargon used by all parties to justify their behavior it is indeed a trademark i.e. merchandising rights and promotion issue. Using GLA as a case in point what were the LSM staff all upset about?
1. Titus Chu dared to publish his own works.
2. Titus Chu declined to promote LSM events and dared to schedule local and regional events when LSM had an event going on.
3. Titus Chu would not take directives from the LSM who claim to be the official bonafide "trademark" owners of the Witness Lee brand i.e Titus Chu is pirating their brand.
WITNESS LEE! WITNESS LEE! WITNESS LEE!