Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Actually their hypocrisy has been exposed on countless occasions that the "true" standard of their approval, getting past all the hype and jive so characteristic with LSM, is not the "ground of oneness" per se, but it is your relationship with LSM.
|
Indeed! The ground of oneness teaching is fraught with several problems not least of which is the lack of practice thereof by those who proclaim it the loudest!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Even though Titus Chu and the rest of the Great Lakes Area churches had all the proper teachings concerning the "ground of oneness," and many in fact had been practicing this way for decades, they were not willing to comply with the growing list of requirements which accompany local church legitimacy, without which their Table must be considered just another division in the body of Christ.
|
And so the likes of Ray Graver can declare with boldness that there are no more lampstands in the GLA and get a ready consensus of this view among his fellow LSMites. A notion that suggests
he is the one walking in the midst of the churches and thus gets to decide who is a lampstand and who isn't.