[OBW]

ZNP,

Yes, there is a warning in there. But the discussion in Nee's booklet was not about the warning. It was about the order of ministry.

I'm trying to stick to talking about what it seems that Nee was talking about. Anywhere else you can take the arguments on other points could be great theology (not meaning that they are dead, just that they are well-founded). But it does not respond to Nee's points.

I seem to have spent a lot of time trying to argue away things that are not what Nee was talking about. It should have been as simple as "could be true and meaningful in its own right, but it is not responsive to Nee's discussion." But it never was. Seems that everyone thought I was trying to dispute the validity of other things. I was not. Just disputing that those other things actually had anything to do with Nee's points.