Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
So then, if Nigel Tomes has "gone out of his way" to explain the "finest of distinctions" between him and Titus doesn't that prove he isn't a proxy for Titus?
|
That would be compelling. Where did he make distinctions between himself and Titus? Where did he contrast his views with those of Titus? We've seen where he included Titus' views with his own. Where did he do the opposite?