Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassidy
That Nigel Tomes became the proxy spokesperson, on the internet, for Titus Chu in 2006 is beyond debate:
"Because of our stand on these points, Titus and I are accused of being “dissenters,” who “teach differently.”
"The allegation that Titus & co. are divisive..."
"We have never opposed..."
"What we oppose is the imposition of this restriction upon other workers (including ourselves) who do not share this view and never endorsed this policy."
"...why quarantine Titus?"
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassidy
Ohio,
I read your objection to my assertion that Nigel was a proxy for Titus on the internet. That is why I posted Nigel's defense of himself and Titus in post #61. I believe his own words from that article are more convincing, more compelling, for his being Titus' spokesman ON THE INTERNET than your objection.
With the passage of time things change and that perhaps you and I are only disagreeing when a divergence between Titus and Nigel occurred and not "if".
Yet, I wonder if Nigel will lend his support to this conference by even showing up and if so how he and Titus would reconcile these polarized statements and teachings.
|
In relation to the Whistler quarantine, I have posted on these forums far more refutations of the Blended writings and actions than Tomes has. Then am I a
proxy for TC and Cleveland too? To speak against the teachings and activities at LSM is not exactly the same as to speak on behalf of TC and Cleveland.
Back in early 2006, as I was beginning to understand what really has happened behind the LC scenes, I remember writing on several occasions concerning Anaheim and Cleveland to the effect --
once one has seriously analyzed and critiqued the policies and actions of the Blendeds, it is only a couple more tiny steps before one realizes that in all essentials WL and TC and the Blendeds are all virtually identical. I wrote this because of the prevailing paradigm promoted by TC that existed in all the GLA LC's which I summarized as "
WL good -- Blended bad."
Since then many more in the GLA LC's have realized the same thing. Perhaps these forums have helped. Perhaps they just began to reflect on years of events. The sad thing about TC and every other brother who ever participated in "the program," is that none of them can part ways on amiable terms. TC has never had actual "peers or friends." Perhaps he thought he did, but Whistler shattered that illusion. Benjamen Chen of NYC, whom he had known for more than half a century, perhaps said it best, "
no one can work with TC." Only those in the GLA who approach him in a manner of "subservience" can actually fellowship with him. He's been known to explode in front of brothers for no reason whatsoever. One little verbal mishap while talking to TC can bring down the house. Of course, I'm not speaking about new ones or sisters, but only those in position of authority.