Quote:
Originally Posted by UntoHim
[COLOR="Navy"]ZNPs "assessment" in neither accurate nor fair, he is simply being argumentative and sidetracking the discussions by trying to address something that Duddy DID NOT SAY, instead of addressing what he did say. I have asked everyone, and ZNP especially, PLEASE ADDRESS WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THE BOOK, NOT WHAT IS NOT WRITTEN IN THE BOOK.
|
Duddy said, and NeitherfirstnorLast quoted it in the post that I replied to that in Lee's theology of salvation "It could be said that people are not so much redeemed as replaced."
I responded to that quote. My response was accurate and I have provided a message from the Truth lessons, used to teach new believers, to demonstrate as briefly as possible that this was so. How am I being "argumentative"? What does that mean? NFNL quoted Duddy, I responded that the quote was false. How is that sidetracking the discussion? What is the discussion if it isn't about Duddy's book and the things he says in the book?
I AM ADDRESSING WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THE BOOK BY DUDDY.
Your accusations are false.