Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
I just think the Lee/Nee work on this subject is very rudimentary. Number one, they don't list their sources. They have the Bible, their logic and the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. You get vague references to teachers past, but without any detail. Their sources are minimal to the extreme. Number two, they treat every other possible viewpoint with almost no respect whatever. Number three, they brook no possibility of any weakness in their own interpretation.
It is like having a conversation with a petulant four-year-old, trembling lower lip and all. I find it very unsatisfying
|
I know what you mean. Dealing with Cassidy is about as intellectually satisfying as trying to get a square peg into a round hole. It always starts out promising, but always comes back to statements like "I don't agree with the teaching of Purgatory so that can't be true."
And you're like,
Dude, I can't believe you said something that prevaricating. 
