View Single Post
Old 08-15-2008, 07:53 AM   #171
OBW
Member
 
OBW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igzy View Post
My main problem with your argument was that you said Hanegraaff was not credible because he didn't know the difference between demons and fallen angels, and tried to use that as a means to diss his whole point.
What do we actually know about the difference between demons and fallen angels? (I'm not saying there is nothing. I'm asking for input.)

What do we know clearly about Satan being or not being in us at birth?

I do think that the mention of Satan "entering" Judas says something for the general understanding that Satan is not living in man. And the reference to Peter as Satan ("get thee behind me") only establishes that Peter was speaking what Satan wanted spoken. It does not establish how that occurred, whether via indwelling or through one of his little fiery darts.
__________________
Mike
I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge
OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel
OBW is offline   Reply With Quote