View Single Post
Old 08-14-2008, 10:26 PM   #158
Cal
Member
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 4,333
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeakersCorner View Post
I CORINTHIANS 11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. 8 For man is not from woman, but woman from man. 9 Nor was man created for the woman, but woman for the man. 10 For this reason the woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels.

If we accept that the "sons of God" in Gen. 6 were angels, v. 10 and the head covering rationale become much more meaningful.

SC
Why? There is no connection. v.10 says angels, not sons of God. I Cor 11 doesn't need Genesis 6 to be valid. And Genesis 6 doesn't say anything about head covering. So I'm not sure what you are getting at.
Cal is offline   Reply With Quote