Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Debelak
I, for one, will not enter into "Those guys did it, so that means this guy did it." Especially when the only account from an understandably frustrated person is disputed from both his relative (which should be taken with skeptism) AND another, non-related poster.
|
I did not enter into that. What I said was I have no reason to doubt awareness story. That is, give his story and Plenteous story, I'm inclined to believe awareness, simply because of the tendency of the LC leaders.
Now that does not mean I declare that Dale Jackson is guilty. That's not my place. All I was suggesting that Plenteous realize it's quite possible.
His post, particularly the description of calling "poisoning" a "subjective characterization." was a classic LC rationalization. Note that he chose not deny that awareness was accused of poisoning, but that doing so could be valid according to one's "subjective" registration.
To me it would have been more honest to simply say "I'm sorry if someone accused you of poisoning because that never should have happened."