[Peter Debelak]

I should also say, so as to keep on topic, I think Nigel's point was not a major one in regards to where Satan dwells. In fact, his article distinguishes between two things that doesn't have a real experiential consequence for me:

1) is a "virtual personification of Satan" indwelling us or
2) are we actually Satan possessed

His point, I think, was not specifically about how important the truth of this matter is, but rather to point out that Brother Lee was wrong on this issue. That is, his point was not about the theology on this point, but rather to show that Lee was not infallible. Likewise with his essay on Ham - Nigel isn't burdened about racism in the LC, he is burdened about a view that considers Lee infallible - that's the reason for writing these articles.

Which is why my posts aren't geared toward the content of Nigel's argument. I have no problem saying, "fine, Satan doesn't dwell in my body." But, somehow, the very nature of sin operates within me and in my members such that I am compelled (not by an outward master) to do that which I don't even want to do.

I think there is a symmetry. The decendant's of Adam are children of the devil - not just slaves to him. Just as we are children of God and slaves of Christ. I don't get all giddy just because there is a symmetry. But if there is one, I'd like not to be condemned as failing from a Lee-disease just because I point it out. That said, I'm also willing to hear a view that explains why I could be misdirected in this area...

Peter