Paul,
Two things.
1) Much of your defense of Lee's theology depends on jumping to conclusions.
2) The fact that you do not disagree with Lee or Nee on anything hurts your credibility, if simply based on the fact that Lee and Nee didnt' agree on everything. But the fact that you act as if you don't differ in any way makes you uncredible. This is why I rarely discuss matters with you. You are not interested in discussion nor in admitting to the weak points of what Lee taught. You simply have an agenda to defend him at all cost. In doing so you just look foolish, like a person who can't think for himself but still wants to be seen as wise.
|