Quote:
Originally Posted by rayliotta
I don't know about RG's writings, but everything you're describing here has been published by LSM. Minister of the age, passing the mantle from Nee to Lee, etc.
Let's be clear, nobody is teaching anything about "A minister of the age". (What would that even mean, anyway, wouldn't it just be "A minister"?) Ron Kangas teaches that "you can't pick and choose from the ministry of the age". I've heard him say this with mine own ears. Others here have testified hearing the same thing. There's nothing "A" about it.
Let's face it, LSM teaches that in every "age", God has one man on the earth, and if you want to be a part of God's "present up-to-date move", you must be with this one man's ministry. This teaching is explicit.
|
I am not aware of this, I never heard RK speak, other than perhaps a testimony. But my point was not what LSM publishes or teaches.
My point was that I never bought into this concept. I heard RG first float this in Houston back in 1981. He shared it over a number of weeks and even when we got to Irving. I listened to everything he shared, I considered it, and I decided that there was no NT basis for the teaching and I decided that the use of Elijah passing the mantle to Elisha was not a valid type. I also decided that RG was essentially speaking independently and could therefore be ignored. I felt that view was supported because LSM didn't publish his speaking. Not only so but there were other leading brothers who made it relatively clear that they didn't buy into this concept, I think GW was one of these.
I don't know very much about RK other than that he helped KR write the white wash "The fermentation...". I also know that he slandered SI down in South America, and that when SI tried to contact him about this he refused to even acknowledge receipt of letters signed for by LSM staff. I don't really see how anything this man says would add credibility to this teaching. Therefore why would I care what RK teaches, I made my own conclusions for myself.