Quote:
Originally Posted by 77150
I answered this question in post 57
|
So the answer is that this is for our benefit in discovering by what means of unrighteousness the BBs erred in the excommunication of TC?
It is just for us?
What do we accomplish?
Since the issue is excommunication, surely an important factor is whether the charge is one scripturally worthy of excommunication. And if it is not, then why does it matter whether they lied to arrive at it? The result is an unrighteousness either way.
I guess I just don't see the importance of proving that anyone lied. I think that misrepresenting the basis for excommunication is sufficiently a lie. Doesn't matter if the claim itself is a lie.
But then, who can say. If the issue is whether they were actually being faithful to the ministry of Lee when they charged TC with not being faithful to the ministry of Lee, it is hard to say since there are so many angles and sides to Lee's ministry. Remember, there's always two sides to truth — at least according to Lee.
So I guess I will be a little less interested in the discussion. Unless it morphs into something else.