Most who have ever been in the LRC have been lied to.
- If you heard the excommunication of Max R
- If you were around when The Fermentation . . . was written
- If you heard the sales pitch for Daystar
- If you were told that the sins of PL, if any, are a private matter and not important to you or to any local church
- If you were lead to believe that there is such a thing as the "Minister of the Age" or a singular "Oracle of God" in this age
But I do agree that it is better that people speak concerning what they know rather than just what they hear from others.
But once the facts are out on the table, why is the jury limited to the abused rather than any participant? In other words, isn't the discussion of the issue better with much consideration rather than just those who are the "injured." Would justice be served better by having only aggrieved persons prosecute, determine guilt, and mete out punishment? Might be a lot of hangings for minor offenses.
And one more consideration: Are we discussing things in terms of Lee's ministry to demonstrate their duplicity and hypocrisy? Otherwise, it is a little like judging a pirate based on the code of ethics of pirates (or a mafia boss/syndicate based on the way another such mafia boss/syndicate acts).
Ultimately we need to judge Lee's teachings in terms of scripture and sound teaching.