Local Church Discussions - View Single Post

TLFisher · 12-28-2011, 02:18 PM

I like what UntoHim is trying to do in fostering communication. I would ask is it possible to bridge the gap without sacrficing integrity? We know the mindset of touching the past is akin to the "Tree of Knowledge". Still it is not possible to sacrifice integrity by looking the other way relating to sins. I ask, is it possible to have dialogue objectively? This would be my first and foremost goal on this forum in relation to brothers and sisters currently meeting in the Local Churches. Past experiences has indicated otherwise; a subjective reaction when questions related to history or practices are asked. At best the response given is "be one with the brothers". Which may illustrate concerns have merit, but not to the point of breaking one accord with the blended brothers.

As far as improvements go, I'd like to see easier thread navigation. Perhaps not having so much content threads are located under.

12-28-2011, 02:18 PM	#2
TLFisher Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Renton, Washington Posts: 3,545	Is it possible to bridge the gap? I like what UntoHim is trying to do in fostering communication. I would ask is it possible to bridge the gap without sacrficing integrity? We know the mindset of touching the past is akin to the "Tree of Knowledge". Still it is not possible to sacrifice integrity by looking the other way relating to sins. I ask, is it possible to have dialogue objectively? This would be my first and foremost goal on this forum in relation to brothers and sisters currently meeting in the Local Churches. Past experiences has indicated otherwise; a subjective reaction when questions related to history or practices are asked. At best the response given is "be one with the brothers". Which may illustrate concerns have merit, but not to the point of breaking one accord with the blended brothers. As far as improvements go, I'd like to see easier thread navigation. Perhaps not having so much content threads are located under.