View Single Post
Old 11-19-2011, 06:23 PM   #138
Cassidy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Regarding the Ground of Locality - David Canfield

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thankful Jane View Post
2Pe 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.

2 Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.
The word of God came to us through holy men, cleansed men, such as David and Moses.

Witness Lee was not clean. His words do not equate to the word of God, though his followers treat his every word as if they did. His defilement, which your post actually admits to, means that his many teachings about the word of God cannot be trusted.


Thankful Jane
Thankful Jane,

You are in no position to make a declaration that Witness Lee was not clean.

All believers are clean by one thing and one thing alone, the precious ever-efficacious blood of Jesus Christ, both your Savior and WL's Savior.

Unreg makes a point, that you avoided or ignored. Using your standard of holiness, then David's Psalms should be stuck from the Bible because he committed adultery and sent Bathsheba's husband into harm's way, premeditated murder of Uriah. Solomon had many wives and committed idolatry so we should strike Song of Songs from the Holy Writ. Moses was excluded from the good land because he misrepresented God before His people so we should take a pair of scissors to the Pentatuech.

Thankful Jane, your definition of "holy" to speak God's Word is out of sync with the testimony of the Bible. You want it both ways and want to apply a double standard. Were it not for the blood of the Lamb and the sanctification of the Holy Spirit none could speak the Word of God.

Cassidy
  Reply With Quote