[Ohio]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

The argument presented by this poster is flawed. It is a fallacy of instances argument. There are more instances of the word "holiness" than there are "oneness" therefore God cares more about holiness than oneness so the argument hinges. The poster concludes that we should take care of holiness and relegates oneness to a lower tier of importance to the point of dismissing it..

There is no basis to apply that kind of "statistical" logic to the Bible. we know holiness, oneness, godliness, righteousness, mercy, kindness, grace, etc. are all mentioned by the Bible and we don't rank them by instances to determine what is more important than another. All are important, relevant, desirable, and applicable in the christian life.

I disagree. Thankful Jane is not using statistics, i.e. "the fallacy of instances," to determine her faith or to interpret scripture. Neither is she dismissing oneness from from the Bible. Please go back and reread her post.