Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
There is the teaching based on Bible verses and there is the practice. My original comment was about what I believed concerning the teaching from WN. I don't think the LRC practice is scriptural because it is sectarian. That doesn't mean the LRC experiment is a waste, rather they have shown us the pitfalls. As for WN I don't believe he would have tolerated his teaching to become the cornerstone of a sect.
|
Probably Nee's motives were a lot purer than Lee's. Probably Nee never would have put up with the MOTA/Apostle of the Age/"Oracle" (!!)/etc/etc teachings that are such a huge part of the sectarian attitude in today's LRC.
But to say that the
churches-in-what-what in mainland China, in the 1930's and 40's, were not already their own little sect --
albeit a "milder", more reasonable sect -- I guess this is where I'm skeptical.