Quote:
Originally Posted by zeek
Let me clarify or, as we used to say in the Local Church "be specific for reality". In your previous post you said :
"Zeek, does it bother you at all that awareness seems to use every opportunity to attack the credibility of the Bible and that of all genuine Christians any chance he can? Where do the limits of free speech end and the respect for God's word begin?"
So my question with respect to particular doctrinal position[s] could rephrased: Are belief in the credibility of the Bible, that the Bible is "God's word" and "respect" for the Bible as "God's Word" required in order to participate here?
|
This is a forum about "the recovery," and is occupied by current and former members. If a poster has no credibility in the Bible and respect for the Bible as God's word, by what basis does he critique "the recovery" and its leaders? By what compass does that poster chart his way?
Can a poster use the Koran to judge WL? Can he use the Apostles' creed to critique the Blendeds? Can the US constitution be used to evaluate the teachings of LSM? What yardstick can be used?