Quote:
Originally Posted by zeek
Sometimes "I don't know" is the correct answer. It's honest, so it's a great place.
|
Fine, but if you don't know it is not reasonable to mock those who are coming up with possible explanations, regardless of how strange they may seem.
100 years ago Wegner proposed a theory that the continents were all moving. This seemed absurd at the time, today it is accepted as a confirmed theory with a very large basis in physical evidence.
2nd, this is not the only site like this. There are sites in many places on Earth that bear a striking similarity. One very reasonable explanation for many of these sites is that they were landing pads. That would explain the large, flat, pavements of very solid or very heavy rock. It would also explain why they are on top of mountains instead of where almost all other human habitations formed which is at the base of mountains where streams and rivers are. Towns formed near farms.
There is other evidence that "landing pads" were needed thousands of years ago. I have already mentioned ancient artifacts from both the Egyptian and Mayan cultures that include scale models of aerodynamically correct flying aircraft. Artifacts that do not resemble anything in nature.
It is in combination with this excellent physical evidence that eyewitness accounts of aerial battles both in ancient India and also in Medieval Europe become much more interesting and believable.
Also, the fact that three separate civilizations without any contact that we know of would all have the same "myth" that people first came from a star in Orion's belt. It is one thing if they all thought man came from the stars, it is very different if they all agree on the actual star that man came from.
To add to this, there is a remarkable artifact from one of these tribes, a model of the star system made of metal. In this model they include a star that cannot be seen without the aid of modern telescopes. Something that this hunter gatherer tribe in Africa does not have.
That model is physical evidence, the pyramids are physical evidence, the artifacts of airplanes are physical evidence, the stones are physical evidence.
Also, please note, the current theory of how the pyramids were built has the Egyptians haulling these stones up a huge ramp, by hand and with ropes, stones weighing several tons each, then moving them to the top of the pyramid, which would become an ever shrinking space considering that you would have hundreds of workers, and placing them into exact position, fitted precisely, all on average of 3 minutes per stone, non stop, for 30 years. Now you tell me who has the fire breathing dragon in their garage?