Quote:
Originally Posted by awareness
I stand corrected. There's way more loopy people than I realized.
|
What I think is loopy is to look at the stones at Puma Punku, with grooves only a few millimeters in width that are perfectly straight, and the exact same depth for the entire length and to say that this was made with hand tools.
I think it is loopy to think that indians would drag stones weighing in excess of 100 tons up to 4,000 meter height. According to History channel one of the blocks is in excess of 800 tons. It is not possible for people and animals to transport a stone that size.
Now to theorize that there were machines involved in this stonework is, to me, the simplest and most reasonable theory. However, to think the Imara indians which did not have a written language, had huge machines to cut stone, machine stone, transport stone, is to my mind very loopy.
So, I think it is an archaelogical site that demands an explanation because we know looking at this site that there is a story here that we are clueless about.